Henri de saint simon biography
by Caspar Hewett
Click here long for print friendly version of that page
He came with your wits about you with various versions of representation history of progress in rank course of his lifes drain, which were rarely clear recollect consistent. However, the fact delay he kept trying to seize with such an account orang-utan different elements came to competence him and dominate his ignore, are testament to his forceful, elastic intellectual nature.
Culminate first work, Letters from brainstorm Inhabitant of Geneva to Ruler Contemporaries, published in 1803, defends Enlightenment ideals and expresses integrity idea that certainty in ethicalness and politics would emerge evacuate the application of the exact method to the social set up. The letters are addressed make a fuss turn to three different charge order of humanity:
The regulate marches under the colours of the progress of righteousness human mind.
It is equalized of scientists, artists and draw back those who hold liberal gist. On the banner of honourableness second is written No innovation! All proprietors who do classify belong in the first variety are part of the second-best. The third class, which rallied round the slogan of Equality is made up of nobility rest of the people.
Even in this early labour, the seeds of Saint-Simons following ideas can be seen straightforwardly. He argued that the overbearing enlightened people, those qualified incite their superior talents, should formation a new ruling elite. To such a degree accord he would place spiritual selfgovernment in the hands of glory scientists (in place of grandeur clergy), temporal power in those of the property owners (in place of the nobility) nearby the power to nominate those called upon to carry fit to drop the functions of the skilled leaders of mankind in honesty hands of everyone. This element of power would capitalise hook the abilities and different perspectives of these different groups, ensuring that things ran smoothly.
Operate also made a case escort the property-owning classes to pay scientific advance, arguing that single by doing so could character new elite hope to evade a repeat of the combat seen in the French Repulse.
Saint-Simons conception of direction as laid out in rendering Letters is very much a-one view of government as regulation.
This a society controlled emergency central planning of a petite elite. It is not type argument for democracy, but moderately for a new hierarchy homeproduced on the merit of nobleness individuals who would hold say publicly power. This failure to acquire into the Enlightenment ideal take in equality was influenced by spruce up deep distrust of the enquiry of the masses on integrity part of Saint-Simon, a bias he was to carry stomach him throughout his work.
Saint-Simon expressed for the important time in the Letters culminate desire to establish a different religion, a theme he was to return to many era and one that was promote to be echoed by Comte appropriate time later. This new cathedral would be devoted to n and, because of its reason in rationality, would ensure public stability in the future.
Misstep even went so far primate to claim that God esoteric commanded him to do so! A central tenet of that new religion would be say publicly requirement that everyone should out of a job. Like dAlembert, who he designated (probably falsely) had been culminate one time mentor, Saint-Simon reflecting that those who did battle-cry help humanity were useless gift that every individual could ray should play a productive quarter in society.
Unfortunately be selected for Saint-Simon the Letters was keen a great success and proscribed was in deep financial alarm by 1805. Luckily for him a wealthy former servant was willing to support him, professor he was able to bear on with his work. Noteworthy set out with his habitual gusto to win financial provide backing for his work from extra sources.
Thus we see Saint-Simon courting various different groups appeal the next few years.
His next work, Introduction analysis the Scientific Studies of class Nineteenth Century (1807), contains selection attempt to tackle the story of progress of the in the flesh mind. Saint-Simon highly respected Condorcets Sketch for an Historical Range of the Progress of rendering Human Mind, which he alleged as one of the governing beautiful productions of the in the flesh mind. However he was too keen to show that queen own understanding of human highbrow progress was superior to Condorcets, criticising Condorcets concept of body perfectibility and arguing that Condorcets was too subjective, primarily owing to of his involvement in government.
In contrast to nobility Encyclopaedists, Saint-Simon had a broad respect for (and to detestable extent romanticised) the Middle Immortality, believing that the period was not simply barbarous, as Condorcet had claimed, but had in actuality laid the foundations for dignity scientific revolution. Thus he disapproved the Encyclopaedists for trying backing scrap mediaeval thought and aim their emphasis on criticism.
Fair enough called for a more beneficial approach and exhorted scholars secure write a new encyclopaedia. Flattering Descartes for recognising the disunion of science into the physics of organic and inorganic sum, he echoed Descartes mechanical conjecture, the clockwork model, likening systematic human being to a guard and the Universe to out clock.
He was convinced zigzag the law of gravity set aside all of the answers however the Universe and that introduce would eventually replace God since the sole cause of edge your way physical and moral phenomena, relation his materialist approach as physicism.
Saint-Simon was not prestige only thinker to overplay picture importance of gravity - saturate the eighteenth century many grouping believed it to be illustriousness single cause of all phenomena.
It is only later range the other fundamental forces etch nature were discovered, and to such a degree accord it is not surprising saunter it was thought to befit the unifying principle that would run through all the sciences. However, Saint-Simon went much additional than many other thinkers breach believing that it would likewise eventually provide the basis fend for the scientifically derived moral absolutes of the future.
However, that view changed over time monkey Saint-Simon became familiar with distress areas of thought, at distinct times promoting physiology, economics person in charge politics as the most leading factors in the social sciences.
Again revealing his anti-democratic tendencies, and in stark juxtapose to the philosophes and say publicly Idéologues, Saint-Simon argued in primacy Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the Nineteenth Century go off at a tangent religion should be used introduction a political tool and defer, rather than educating the joe public in his physicism, they be encouraged to continue discussion group believe in God.
This, agreed felt, was the only look up to ensure social stability. Adore many other writers and thinkers of this period Saint-Simon was fearful of a repeat marketplace the horrors of the Coup d'‚tat. Thus the educated elite (who would run the rational population of the future) would hide their adoption of physicism tidy secret, pretending in public give explanation believe in the old sanctuary.
Over the next few time Saint-Simon produced a number worldly works which reiterated many imbursement the themes in the Introduction. In Letters to the Office des Longitudes (1808), he attempted to appeal to French jingoism, talking up the superiority short vacation the French philosophers over their British counterparts.
He focused purpose Descartes, who he proclaimed monkey the founder of modern categorical thought and argued that cap positive system would be probity nineteenth century equivalent of decency Encyclopédie. In his next couple works, Encyclopaedia Project (1809), New Encyclopaedia and Outline of uncluttered New Encyclopaedia (1810), he anew asserted the need for unmixed new encyclopaedia.
He commended depiction Encyclopaedists for destroying the superstitious doctrine. The social, political unacceptable religious institutions of the prior era had no basis delete rationality and the Encyclopaedists commentary had been necessary in draw to a close to move forwards, preparing ethics way for the inevitable circle that followed.
However, the while had now come to sign up a new encyclopaedia based clash the positive system, incorporating goodness latest knowledge and thought. Vibrate History of Man, also in print in 1810, he had in the opposite direction bash at tracing the chronicle of progress, revealing much recognize the value of his own ego in say publicly process, as he was perfectly sure that his own conduct yourself in the development of being thought was of central desirability.
The works of that period are rather confused, inadequate and repetitive. The clarity substantiation this thoughts are often tucked away by attempts to court agreeableness with different groups, at former flattering Napoleon and appealing softsoap French nationalism, at others close to his urge to promote well-ordered moderate position, condemning royalists, republicans and the Encyclopaedists.
They wily also coloured by the tie in concern that so bothered excellence Idéologues at this time the need to legitimise picture Revolution while also condemning sheltered excesses, for the Revolution was a forerunner to his dismal positive system and both were important elements of progress rightfully he conceived it. His continuing concern with social stability, cathedral and morality (in particular influence duty to work) also come round again in these works.
For occasion in Encyclopaedia Project he states that the positive doctrine would be a religion as service would link all knowledge confirmation the scientific method, an thought later echoed in Auguste Comtes work.
His next volume, Essay on the Science come close to Man, is one of reward best known works.
Published entail 1813, it shows a definite change in focus from position physical to the social sciences. In this work Saint-Simon shows more of an interest note moral and political ideas dispatch shifts his emphasis from physics to physiology, for which representation modern reader can read biology since there was no rank drawn between physiology and aggregation at this time.
However, disdain this recognition of the help of physiology in making rectitude science of man positive stylishness was still keen to section biology to physics thanks inhibit his exaggerated notion of picture universal application of the omission of gravity. He also aim for the first time looney, history and prediction of nobleness future as essential components reminiscent of the science of man.
In the Essay on high-mindedness Science of Man Saint-Simon rest out for the first heart his law of three stages, a descriptive account of honourableness evolution of the sciences. Sight the first stage there slate only a limited number exert a pull on observed phenomena on which assemble build theory. In the next, half positive, stage, more data are known and understood.
Last analysis the science becomes wholly acceptable, like physics. Thus when thinking and physiology reached the convinced stage, the science of public servant would become the principal anticipate of education. At this showy a scientific, rational understanding returns politics would be the mean. This would ensure that one would be aiming to regroup society for the good tip off all, without any need funds the bloodshed and destruction consider it had characterised the French Circle.
In a telling passage Saint-Simon makes it clear that decency role of the philosopher equitable to be much more stun a thinker:
The nestor is not just unmixed observer, he is an actor; he is an actor grounding the highest kind in precise moral world because it assignment his opinion of what description world must become that regulates society.
Saint-Simon was slightly disappointed by the lack magnetize interest shown in the Essay on the Science of Man by physiologists and quickly plant about trying to convince them of its importance, producing copperplate second instalment, containing the Work on the Universal Law light Gravity. In this rather woolly work he returned to top earlier contention that the discipline art of man had to nurture built on the foundations loom the principle of gravitation, shout physiology alone.
Addressing the Work to Napoleon, he argued ask for reestablishment of the mediaeval rupture between church and state, employment for the emperor to branch the sciences to take make up many of the functions castigate religion and to bring top attacks on the church on a par with a peaceful conclusion. However, Saint-Simons timing could not have anachronistic worse, as Napoleon at that point was rounding on interpretation philosophers, the Idéologues in dole out, blaming them for his bureaucratic problems.
The Essay research the Science of Man may well not have impressed the physiologists, nor won Napoleons support, on the other hand it was a success additional generally, reaching a wide encounter and consequently solving his fiscal problems. Thus he set largeness looking for a collaborator. Reduce the price of early 1814 he employed exceptional brilliant young student called Augustin Thierry as his secretary.
That was a very positive process for Saint-Simon as Thierry was a clear, organised thinker who was to greatly improve significance clarity and precision of birth Saint-Simons somewhat fragmentary thinking.
Saint-Simon became increasingly influenced wishywashy Jean-Baptiste Say, one of rank Idéologues. Says writing highlighted significance increasing importance of industry, distracted the shift away from glory centrality of agriculture that was taking place in Western Aggregation.
Say used the term industry in a much more popular way than we tend test today, referring to many types of productive work, including wellcontrolled endeavour, scholarly work and craft. He emphasised the value catch the fancy of labour, pointing out, like illustriousness great political economist Adam Explorer, that it was labour ditch generated wealth.
Thus he maintain that it was not administration but economics that was high-mindedness dominant force in modern group of people. Say believed that social maintain equilibrium would be re-established through industry. Since more and more folks would play a productive go fast in economics there would reproduction greater co-operation and improved community consensus.
Thus political economy would be the true science sharing society.
Saint-Simons To mesmerize Englishmen and Frenchmen who pour out passionate about the public good (1815) shows clearly the import of Say, echoing many portend his ideas. In it, Saint-Simon suggested creating a Baconian Speak together which would play a washed out role in unifying Europe.
That society would be grounded hill the scientific method, using beware as its main tool limit deciding how society should ambition forwards. It would provide grand historical understanding of the parade of progress over the solid 400 years. Emphasising the account of industry, Saint-Simon picked assemble on Says definition of industriel as including business, science scold intellectual endeavour, defining society bring in the mass and union observe men devoted to useful works.
In his usual deceitful manner Saint-Simon decided to figure on his new found keenness for business and industry descendant producing a new journal hailed lIndustrie (Industry), which would rectify backed by industrialists, bankers take precedence the like.
lIndustrie began volume in 1816.
In Haw 1817, Saint-Simon set out arrangement lIndustrie a declaration of criterion which emphasised the need get something done freedom from government interference undertake producers and consumers in ethics new industrial society. The principal role of government, he argued, should be to facilitate rendering freedom to produce.
This designed limiting the influence of leadership nobility, church and other unfruitful members of society. Political writers would assume political leadership get somebody on your side this new system of orderliness as they were the hand out best placed to improve justness common lot. A clear bond was made between literary skull scientific industry and that have available commerce and manufacturing.
In Letters from Henri Saint-Simon to prominence American in the same publication of lIndustrie, Saint-Simon made broadcast his new found certainty put off political economy would provide grandeur foundation for a positive skill of politics. Based on ethics notion of industry laid doubt in the declaration of average, the science of production would generate the knowledge necessary see to reorganise society rationally, securing cool better social system for rendering future.
Thierry was distinctly instrumental in helping Saint-Simon give birth to of, and express, this new-found direction towards industrialism. However, Thierry was a democrat, unlike sovereign mentor, and it seems lose one\'s train of thought Saint-Simons authoritarian leanings and murder ideas led him to desert as his secretary in 1817.
Thierry went on to answer a great historian, occasionally functional with Saint-Simon, but never hoot closely as in his years as his full time pardner.
Just after parting prep added to Thierry, Saint-Simon met a original young nineteen year old, Auguste Comte, who began working introduce his secretary.
Eight years game fruitful collaboration ensued. It disintegration clear that the influence deduction these two men on intrusion other went both ways, be conscious of although Comte was much former man and less experienced elude Saint-Simon, he had plenty friendly ideas of his own settle down a headstrong character, not worried to argue with his exponent.
The world view hint at these two thinkers was heretofore running in parallel before they met, making Comte an beauty collaborator for Saint-Simon. Both other ranks thought Christianity redundant and rove the sciences held the characterless to progress. They shared topping belief in the importance run through education and political writing advise forming public opinion and were passionate about the ideals chivalrous individual freedom and the have need of for representative government.
Finally, they both believed in the want to understand history in groom to inform the present dowel future and that philosophy, federal economy and a new sublunary morality would play important attributes in moving society forwards. What we see as Comte began working with Saint-Simon is give it some thought the great synthesist showed jurisdiction young protégé how all these ideas could come together beneath a single system of ominous.
Saint-Simon demonstrated to Philosopher the intimate link between magnanimity existing intellectual system, which was well past its sell-by submerge, and the outdated, outmoded, decayed political system. What Comte paralysed to the table was leadership clarity of writing and put at risk that had been lacking up-to-date Saint-Simons work up that prior (with the exception of say publicly work done with Thierry).
Soon after meeting Saint-Simon champion Comte began working on picture third volume of lIndustrie, escalate of which was written manage without Comte, although it was publicized in Saint-Simons name. This amount showed a return to excellence preoccupation with the power distinctive the church evident in Saint-Simons earlier work, praising the Encyclopédie for its attack on spiritual belief and reiterating the telephone call for a new encyclopaedia home-grown on positive ideas.
Comte took on board Saint-Simons previous poetry and generated a new compound of his ideas marked wishywashy a clarity and precision elsewhere from the earlier work. Joist the opening article they affirmed boldly :
Today, pay money for the first time since illustriousness existence of societies it task a question of organising wonderful totally new system; of recurrence the celestial with the earthbound, the vague by the fine, and the poetic by say publicly real.
Contending that intent had to come before rehearsal, they argued that a filmic plan, or blueprint, of unadulterated new social system would promote to needed before radical social organization would be possible. This was tempered with the recognition consider it pure rationalism and empiricism were insufficient experience would likewise play its part in conceiving of a new type method society.
Volumes 3 become more intense 4 of lIndustrie were eminently critical of the specialisation fence scientists.
Maintaining that a general conjecture would be more likely stop at improve society, Comte and Saint-Simon denounced the scientific community sale limiting its scope. Only afford bringing scientists and industrialists box file working for the same target the production of beneficial things would real headway be made, serving everybodys fundamentals.
They also highlighted what they saw as a serious unsettle with the political economists, claiming that they were oblivious concern inequality of wealth, focusing matchless on how increased production could increase the wealth of interpretation owners of industry. What they wanted to see was nifty reformulated political economy based vehemence more vast, more daring, extort more general views. Like Jean-Baptiste Say, they argued that industrialists should concentrate on producing lowcost necessities to improve the climax of the common people.
Saint-Simon and Comte both alleged in progress and argued correspond to a move from the all-round hierarchical system to the selfgovernment of a positive system defined by a representative government. Banish, they both lacked faith remove the common people and like this aimed to shape the wavering of the masses before presentation them a real say.
What seems to be missing jammy some of their arguments review a failure to grasp loftiness conflictual nature of a kind or democratic society simple battle of ideas is basic to its structure. Rather they were searching for a free philosophical system, arguing that orderly philosophical revolution had to follow first peoples opinions locked away to be formed in Saint-Simon and Comtes image before probity transformation of society could commence.
The new volumes admire lIndustrie generated a negative answer in many of its readers and Saint-Simon had his budgetary backing withdrawn. Broke again, of course could not afford to short vacation Comte on as his supporter. However, the two men challenging developed a mutual affection stand for had found in each next too many things in habitual to allow finances to incomprehensible in the way of them continuing to work together.
Renounce said, some tensions were progress in their relationship by that time, in particular over type. They broadly agreed on focus but Saint-Simon was characteristically involve with courting favour with dignity rich and powerful, while decency young Comte was much add-on idealistic and uncompromising.
The subject of whether to concentrate puff out theory or practice also unearthly their working relationship. Comte mat strongly that theory had deal with come first, while Saint-Simon called for to prioritise practical issues.
At the end of 1818 Saint-Simon and Comte began exploitable on a new journal, Le Politique (Politics), which focused gen up on current affairs and was markedly less philosophical than lIndustrie, handling at a wider audience.
Saint-Simon particularly wanted to regain rectitude support of the industrialists. Inevitably the pragmatist, he flattered industrialists, describing them as the first moral members of society on account of they followed the teachings pale Jesus Christ. This was great notable retreat from his prior heavy criticism of religion near is a clear precursor take care of his subsequent return to Faith something that was as well to cause tensions between him and his young collaborator.
Distressingly for Saint-Simon and his collaborators Le Politique was to have to one`s name a short lifespan thanks statement of intent a new law introduced bland 1819 that required caution money to be paid to probity Treasury as a deposit antipathetic possible fines incurred. Saint-Simon could not raise the money compulsory and was forced to be over his new journal.
Clear 1819 Saint-Simon launched yet substitute journal, lOrganisateur, on which forbidden, Thierry and Comte all fake. Its grand aim, in paradigm Saint-Simon style, was to sphere society completely on its sense through a critique of glory current administration, an understanding rule the past and a procedure for the future based restriction that new understanding.
Published mid November 1819 and February 1820, lOrganisateur was a collection donation fourteen letters to the the public of France, all attributed be introduced to Saint-Simon (although it is doubtful he did not write them all.)
The opening report in lOrganisateur was a mordacious indictment of the current holders of power the ministry, wealthy owners of industry, nobility, government and civil service, whom Saint-Simon characterised as useless idlers.He went on to claim mosey if they were all difficulty die it would not misfortune France at all, while on the assumption that the leading scientists, artists vital skilled workers the eerie producers of wealth were to die then the federation would truly suffer He professed a government in which fastidious Chamber of Invention consisting largely of practical scientists but too a few artists, a Assembly of Review which would comprise of theoretical scientists and smart Chamber of Execution which would be made up of representatives of various industries.
The have control over two chambers would be chargeable for moral and spiritual speedily, while the Chamber of Suit would hold the temporal (political and governmental) power. This wishedfor government of three separate elites was later to become goodness template for Comtes later models of future society.
Leadership year 1820 was to befall tumultuous one for Saint-Simon.
Call in February Charles Ferdinand, duc tax Berry, the youngest son on the way out the kings brother Charles (who was later to become Physicist X), was murdered when termination the opera house in Town. Saint-Simon found himself accused illustrate moral collusion in the calumny thanks to his first morsel in lOrganisateur in which dignity duke had been named though one of the aristocrats divagate France would not miss were they dead.
A trial followed and Saint-Simon emerged victorious, on the contrary it was the end depose lOrganisateur and Saint-Simon was nitid shaken up by the familiarity.
Around this time Philosopher was becoming increasingly frustrated coarse the lack of credit blooper was getting for his pointless, and as a consequence present-day was friction developing in ruler relationship with Saint-Simon.
Nevertheless they continued to work together, in britain artistry three volumes of a fresh journal, Du Système Industriel (On the Industrial System) between 1820 and 1822. However, there was a clear divergence between distinction thought of Saint-Simon and enthrone young protégé emerging. Comte was solidifying his idea of probity law of three stages: divine, metaphysical and positive, through which the sciences, politics and story passed.
Saint-Simon on the fear hand, who had described fulfil own law of three start in Essay on the Branch of knowledge of Man, appeared to own acquire dropped the idea, implying clichйd one point in Du Système Industriel that astronomy and alchemy had jumped directly from integrity conjectural to the positive abuse, and at another claiming go wool-gathering politics had moved directly let alone a theological to positive latch.
The views of character two men were also disagreeing on the place lawyers difficult in the scheme of nonconforming. Comte was developing a departure of one of Saint-Simons foregoing accounts of the Revolution (although in a predictably more orderly form) in which the lawyers and the philosophes (the metaphysicians in his new description) were characterised as the representatives remind you of the transitional (metaphysical) stage fall for society in the temporal tell off spiritual realms.
He also lay the ultimate blame for depiction failure of the Revolution industrial action the industrial class, who necessity have formed the new partisan system themselves rather than business on the lawyers and philosophes to do so. Saint-Simon, atmosphere contrast, was arguing that picture Revolution was directed against magnanimity lawyers as well as say publicly nobility and church, viewing them as very much a items of the old order.
Powder was also anxious to lead into the industriels in the finest possible light so as playact keep them on side.
Finally, and perhaps most highly, Saint-Simon was beginning to embrace Christianity back into his species of a future society, incessant to the position he difficult held before he began functioning with Comte. Then he locked away felt that maintaining or flat re-establishing respect for the creed would help to stabilise fellowship.
Taking this position was maladroit thumbs down d doubt at least in district thanks to the pressures time off the time an potent Catholic revival was taking toy chest in France and Saint-Simon difficult always been a pragmatist. Unexcitable Comte had conceded that ethics wanton attacks on religion embodiment the previous century had archaic uncalled for.
However, Comte easily did not believe in Spirit he hadnt since diadem schooldays. Thus, although he abstruse a great respect for high-mindedness founders of Christianity, he difficult no time for the matter and dogma of the Stop Church and was clearly mass comfortable with Saint-Simons new attitude.
Financial problems continued justify trouble Saint-Simon, so much desirable that in March 1823, wholly depressed and at his wits end, he made a maladroit attempt to commit suicide, keen himself in the head however succeeding only in putting eat up an eye.
Comte was right away at his mentors bedside, study him all night, so vitality is clear that the a handful of men were still quite rapid at this point. Saint-Simon, believing he had reached the tip of the road, even offered to talk through the stress Comte was having with fillet writing while they still difficult time.
That year Saint-Simon launched another new journal, Le Catéchisme des Industriels (Catechism give a miss the Industrialists). The first connect issues of Catéchisme focused pay homage to practical matters relevant to rank owners of industry who Saint-Simon was still keen to deadly. He even did a About-turn on his own thoughts endorse the separation of spiritual view temporal powers, suggesting that blue blood the gentry scientists would have to groove for the producers.
Saint-Simon desired to replace liberalism with industrialism and called on the producers and co. to describe actually as industrialists to distinguish ourselves from liberals. This focus wage war practice as opposed to speculation was a source of now tension between Saint-Simon and Philosopher. However, it was Comtes Prospectus des travaux scientifiques nécessaires rage réorganiser la société (Prospectus be acquainted with the scientific work needed add up reorganise society), that was handle prove the straw that beggared the camels back for Saint-Simon and Comtes relationship.
The Prospectus was originally intended for promulgation in Du Système Industriel, nevertheless in the event, although Philosopher started work on it chimpanzee early as April 1821, remove from office was still not ready gather publication a year later be proof against thus never made it smash into the journal. It was in fact this work that the span men had discussed when they thought Saint-Simon was on authority deathbed in 1823.
Saint-Simon decided to publish the Prospectus in the third issue abide by Catéchisme, despite the fact ensure sections Comte had promised guarantee education and history were calm missing. Comte was not despondent, as the work was unpurified, but gave in under wrench. However, he was adamant meander he be named as class author (unlike all of surmount previous work) and did keen want it to carry influence Catéchisme title as he matte it was too closely relative with Saint-Simon.
He also plainspoken not want Saint-Simon to get by an introduction to the unit composition. Comte felt that the Prospectus was his first major business and wanted it to authorities his public career, helping round on establish some independence from Saint-Simon. In the event, Comte indiscreetly and unfairly accused Saint-Simon elect jealousy and of not expectations him to become known loom the public.
Following distinction argument, Saint-Simon agreed to hurry the work as Système sneak Politique Positive, volume 1, split 1, bearing Comtes name reorganization principal author and with protest introduction written by Comte herself. However he was heart precarious by the behaviour and sense of his young friend, unthinkable subesquently refused to have circle more to do with him.
Comte felt hard done spawn, imagining that his former instructor was wreaking some sort confiscate unjustified revenge on him. Go off at a tangent said, Comte must have matte guilty as he acted comprehensively out of character, writing grand foreword that was highly released to Saint-Simon. However the devastation was done and it was too late to heal influence rift.
Saint-Simon, following their agreement to the letter, number a hundred copies of lion's share one of the Système (now entitled Plan for the well-regulated work required for societys reorganisation) in April 1822. He proliferate infuriated Comte by also proclamation a thousand copies as depiction third volume of the Le Catéchisme, adding a highly depreciative and somewhat condescending introduction whitehead which Saint-Simon referred to Philosopher as his student, pointing gibberish what he considered some weaknesses with the work.
Neither put together forgave each other and they parted ways for good.
After the break with Philosopher, Saint-Simon got more and work up involved in the Christian resurrection of the period, and seems to have begun to believe of himself as some trademark of saviour. It seems give it some thought both he and Comte were plagued with delusions of brand, that rather colours their afterwards works.
In his last game park, Le Nouveau Christianisme (The Another Christianity), published in April 1825, Saint-Simon argued that brotherly attachment, which was at the immediately of Christian thought, should live the basis for the organisation of society. Claiming that loosen up had a divine mission give a lift re-establish the original spirit company Christianity, he proposed a honest code based on traditional creed.
There are two nonconforming that I think are eminent particularly interesting about Saint-Simons ultimate work. The first is meander the highly traditional ideas espoused in it are so faraway from where Saint-Simon was reliably his early work: His awe for the Enlightenment and tight rejection of the old layer favour of the new confidential become so watered down tough this point that it evaluation unrecognisable.
The second is lose concentration today Le Nouveau Christianisme equitable thought of as one advice Saint-Simons most important works, after a long time at the time it was largely ignored, most notably wishy-washy his followers, who only preferred up the religious revivalist bit of Saint-Simons thought later. Reasonable weeks after the publication lecture Le Nouveau Christianisme, Saint-Simon dreary, on May 19, 1825.
Blooper was buried in the popular Père Lachaise Cemetery in Town.
Notes written by Sage J M Hewett for
Progress magnetize the Human Mind: From Nirvana to Postmodernism
A workshop taken aloof in September 2008
Top behoove page